Cross-reference Integrity
qpdf reported structural verification issues
52919Financialclosure-fake.pdf · 771 KB
SUSPICIOUS
Detected type: Other
Finance category: Other Finance
Combined risk
77/100
System confidence: 78%
Easy Summary
Some suspicious or inconsistent signals were found. Manual review is recommended.
Next step: Review highlighted findings and compare against source bank or card issuer records before acceptance.
Suspected changed fields
These values are not proven originals or edits by themselves, but they sit in the strongest payment/date/amount evidence zones.
Qpdf Check Failed
checking /tmp/piksign_bank_k65bl1f_.pdf
PDF Version: 1.7
File is not encrypted
File is linearized
WARNING: /tmp/piksign_bank_k65bl1f_.pdf: linearized file contains an uncompressed object after a compressed one in a cross-reference stream
WARNING: /tmp/piksign_bank_k65bl1f_.pdf: page 0 has shared id
qpdf reported structural problems.
15Passed
12Warnings
2Critical
0Math issues
Trailer Structure
Trailer marker not found in byte scan
EOF Marker Count
2 EOF marker(s) detected
Incremental Update Detection
1 incremental update section(s) detected
Creator Metadata
Creator metadata missing
Creation/Modification Timestamp Proximity
Difference: 525600.0 minutes
ExifTool Metadata Cross-check
Creator/Producer values differ between qpdf-derived and ExifTool-derived metadata.
Font Inventory
0 unique font(s) detected
No Extractable Text Layer
The PDF has pages but no extractable text layer. For invoice-like uploads this can indicate a flattened image export or edited/regenerated copy that cannot be content-verified.
Basic Structural Markers
Missing dates or monetary values lowers confidence in structural coherence.
Totals Marker Presence
Absence of total markers in a financial-looking document is flagged.
Ocr Vs Embedded Text Layer Consistency
Visible text appears substantially richer than the embedded text layer, which can indicate flattened or selectively regenerated content.
PDF Header Validity
Header present: %PDF-1.7
Cross-reference Integrity
qpdf reported structural verification issues
Trailer Structure
Trailer marker not found in byte scan
EOF Marker Count
2 EOF marker(s) detected
Incremental Update Detection
1 incremental update section(s) detected
Object Count Consistency
Byte estimate 3, object estimate 14
Creator Metadata
Creator metadata missing
Producer Metadata
Producer: u:OpenPDF UNKNOWN
Creator/Producer Relationship
Insufficient data for family comparison
Creation/Modification Timestamp Proximity
Difference: 525600.0 minutes
Metadata Completeness
Metadata is present but should be interpreted with context
ExifTool Metadata Cross-check
Creator/Producer values differ between qpdf-derived and ExifTool-derived metadata.
Font Inventory
0 unique font(s) detected
Font Mixing Heuristic
Font mixing appears within normal range
Annotations Presence
Annotations detected
Form Fields Presence
No form field markers detected
Embedded File Presence
No embedded file markers detected
JavaScript/Action Objects
No JavaScript/action markers detected
White Overlay Rectangle Heuristic
No unusual white overlay pattern detected
Hidden Content / Redaction Recovery Clues
No strong hidden-content/redaction marker combination detected
Image/Object Replacement Clues
No strong replacement clue combination detected
Digital Signature Presence
No digital signature markers detected.
Signature Trust Validation
Document is not signed; trust validation is not applicable.
Signature ByteRange Integrity
No signature markers detected; ByteRange integrity check is not applicable.
Object Stream Irregularities
Object stream markers appear internally consistent
Flattened/Regenerated Structure Heuristic
No strong regeneration marker detected
File Size/Page/Object Density Heuristic
File size 790294 bytes, pages 1, object density 14.00
Passport Acknowledgement Generation Profile
No Passport Seva acknowledgement generation-profile mismatch detected
Source Provenance Markers
No strong source-generation markers detected
Payment/content review: SUSPICIOUS
Basic arithmetic result: SUSPICIOUS. Payment/date/amount fields still look suspicious from visual and statement-field evidence.
Detected details
Datementions0
Amountmentions0
LikelytravelticketFalse
Basic Structural Markers
Should be: At least one date and one amount for financial docs · Found in file: dates=0, amounts=0
Missing dates or monetary values lowers confidence in structural coherence.
Totals Marker Presence
Should be: Total markers appear in summary-capable docs · Found in file: 0 total marker(s)
Absence of total markers in a financial-looking document is flagged.
Ocr Vs Embedded Text Layer Consistency
Should be: Visible/OCR text should largely align with embedded text layer · Found in file: similarity=0.00, ocrCriticalCoverage=0.00, embeddedTokens=0, ocrTokens=85
Visible text appears substantially richer than the embedded text layer, which can indicate flattened or selectively regenerated content.
Bank document content presence
Should be: bank-related text · Found in file: missing
Basic text extraction should find document content.
No Extractable Text Layer
The PDF has pages but no extractable text layer. For invoice-like uploads this can indicate a flattened image export or edited/regenerated copy that cannot be content-verified.
Field replacement detection
No field-level replacement anomalies were detected by deterministic structural/content consistency rules. Typography/alignment-only differences are treated as advisory.
Risk score0/100
Assessed fields0
Bank document module: SUSPICIOUS
Some suspicious or inconsistent signals were found. Manual review is recommended.
Extracted bank fields
Bank document content presence
Expected: bank-related text · Found: missing
Basic text extraction should find document content.