Trailer marker not found in byte scan
Acct_Statement_XXXXXXXX2346_24122025_Changed.pdf · 802 KB
LIKELY TAMPERED
Detected type: Bank Statement
Finance category: Bank Statement
Corroborated manipulation indicators were detected: invoice amount math conflicts align with field-level replacement signals and revision markers.
Suspected changed fields
These values are not proven originals or edits by themselves, but they sit in the strongest payment/date/amount evidence zones.
Byte estimate 1, object estimate 21492
Creator/Producer values differ between qpdf-derived and ExifTool-derived metadata.
File size 821487 bytes, pages 16, object density 1343.25
A small cluster of amount/date/identifier-like text uses a different font from the dominant document text, a pattern consistent with localized field editing or overlay replacement.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Numeric endings are strongly misaligned compared with expected generated table alignment.
Baseline and row-gap consistency shows moderate irregularity in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency is strongly irregular in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency is strongly irregular in table-like sections.
Header present: %PDF-1.7
qpdf verification passed without fatal errors
Trailer marker not found in byte scan
1 EOF marker(s) detected
No incremental updates detected
Byte estimate 1, object estimate 21492
Creator: u:Microsoft® Word for Microsoft 365
Producer: u:Microsoft® Word for Microsoft 365
Creator family other, producer family other
Difference: 0.0 minutes
Metadata is present but should be interpreted with context
Creator/Producer values differ between qpdf-derived and ExifTool-derived metadata.
2 unique font(s) detected
Font mixing appears within normal range
Annotations detected
No form field markers detected
No embedded file markers detected
No JavaScript/action markers detected
No unusual white overlay pattern detected
No strong hidden-content/redaction marker combination detected
No strong replacement clue combination detected
No digital signature markers detected.
Document is not signed; trust validation is not applicable.
No signature markers detected; ByteRange integrity check is not applicable.
Object stream markers appear internally consistent
No strong regeneration marker detected
File size 821487 bytes, pages 16, object density 1343.25
No Passport Seva acknowledgement generation-profile mismatch detected
Potential source-generation markers detected in metadata/object content
Detected details
Should be: Each row balance follows prior balance +/- debit/credit · Found in file: 221 row mismatch(es)
Transaction-level running balance continuity test.
Should be: Each transaction row should primarily indicate debit or credit · Found in file: 266 ambiguous row(s)
Rows carrying both debit and credit values are unusual in standard statement exports.
Should be: Chronological order · Found in file: 15 out-of-order rows
Date sequence inconsistency may indicate row insertion/reordering.
Should be: Minimal duplicate references · Found in file: 1 duplicate reference(s)
Repeated transaction reference values can be a notable anomaly.
Should be: Visible/OCR text should largely align with embedded text layer · Found in file: similarity=0.15, ocrCriticalCoverage=0.90, embeddedTokens=1092, ocrTokens=180
OCR-visible content is broadly consistent with the embedded text layer.
Should be: None · Found in file: None
Required summary fields were not all extracted.
Should be: None · Found in file: None
No transaction rows were extracted.
A small cluster of amount/date/identifier-like text uses a different font from the dominant document text, a pattern consistent with localized field editing or overlay replacement.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Numeric endings are strongly misaligned compared with expected generated table alignment.
Baseline and row-gap consistency shows moderate irregularity in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency is strongly irregular in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency is strongly irregular in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency is strongly irregular in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency shows moderate irregularity in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency shows moderate irregularity in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency shows moderate irregularity in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency is strongly irregular in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency is strongly irregular in table-like sections.
Baseline and row-gap consistency is strongly irregular in table-like sections.
Multiple overlapping text boxes were detected. This pattern can be consistent with patch-style edits.
Totals/signature/footer markers appear at inconsistent vertical zones across pages.
Field replacement detection
Advisory field-level typography/alignment inconsistencies were observed, but no structural/content manipulation evidence was detected.
Possible field replacement: field typography differs from nearby text; field text spacing is irregular versus surrounding typography; field text has unusual intra-value spacing.
Possible field replacement: multiple variants of this critical field appear across pages; account number format is inconsistent with typical statement patterns; hard evidence is limited to one structural/content rule layer and should be interpreted cautiously.
Advisory field-level risk: field text spacing is irregular versus surrounding typography; field horizontal alignment diverges from peer rows. This is not treated as manipulation evidence unless supported by structural/content checks.
Extracted bank fields
Expected: N/A · Found: N/A
Required summary fields were not all extracted.
Expected: N/A · Found: N/A
No transaction rows were extracted.