Trailer marker not found in byte scan
AXIS BANK SAVINGS REAL.pdf · 74 KB
LIKELY TAMPERED
Detected type: Bank Statement
Finance category: Bank Statement
Corroborated manipulation indicators were detected: invoice amount math conflicts align with field-level replacement signals and revision markers.
Suspected changed fields
These values are not proven originals or edits by themselves, but they sit in the strongest payment/date/amount evidence zones.
Creator metadata missing
Creator/Producer values differ between qpdf-derived and ExifTool-derived metadata.
A small cluster of amount/date/identifier-like text uses a different font from the dominant document text, a pattern consistent with localized field editing or overlay replacement.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Totals/signature/footer markers appear at inconsistent vertical zones across pages.
Transaction-level running balance continuity test.
Rows carrying both debit and credit values are unusual in standard statement exports.
Date sequence inconsistency may indicate row insertion/reordering.
OCR-visible content only partially aligns with embedded text on critical tokens; manual verification is recommended.
Possible field replacement: field baseline is shifted versus nearby row content; field horizontal alignment diverges from peer rows; field value consistency is weak across page-level references.
Header present: %PDF-1.5
qpdf verification passed without fatal errors
Trailer marker not found in byte scan
1 EOF marker(s) detected
No incremental updates detected
Byte estimate 34, object estimate 30
Creator metadata missing
Producer: u:iLovePDF
Insufficient data for family comparison
Created and modified timestamps are incomplete
Metadata is present but should be interpreted with context
Creator/Producer values differ between qpdf-derived and ExifTool-derived metadata.
4 unique font(s) detected
Font mixing appears within normal range
Annotations detected
No form field markers detected
No embedded file markers detected
No JavaScript/action markers detected
No unusual white overlay pattern detected
No strong hidden-content/redaction marker combination detected
No strong replacement clue combination detected
No digital signature markers detected.
Document is not signed; trust validation is not applicable.
No signature markers detected; ByteRange integrity check is not applicable.
Object stream markers appear internally consistent
No strong regeneration marker detected
File size 76279 bytes, pages 3, object density 10.00
No Passport Seva acknowledgement generation-profile mismatch detected
Potential source-generation markers detected in metadata/object content
Detected details
Should be: Each row balance follows prior balance +/- debit/credit · Found in file: 6 row mismatch(es)
Transaction-level running balance continuity test.
Should be: Each transaction row should primarily indicate debit or credit · Found in file: 3 ambiguous row(s)
Rows carrying both debit and credit values are unusual in standard statement exports.
Should be: Chronological order · Found in file: 3 out-of-order rows
Date sequence inconsistency may indicate row insertion/reordering.
Should be: Visible/OCR text should largely align with embedded text layer · Found in file: similarity=0.21, ocrCriticalCoverage=0.58, embeddedTokens=524, ocrTokens=208
OCR-visible content only partially aligns with embedded text on critical tokens; manual verification is recommended.
Should be: None · Found in file: None
Required summary fields were not all extracted.
Should be: None · Found in file: None
No transaction rows were extracted.
A small cluster of amount/date/identifier-like text uses a different font from the dominant document text, a pattern consistent with localized field editing or overlay replacement.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Row spacing shows irregular variance beyond normal table/body layout tolerance.
Totals/signature/footer markers appear at inconsistent vertical zones across pages.
Field replacement detection
Some fields show suspicious field-level inconsistencies with partial structural/content corroboration.
Possible field replacement: field baseline is shifted versus nearby row content; field horizontal alignment diverges from peer rows; field value consistency is weak across page-level references.
Possible field replacement: field typography differs from nearby text; field text spacing is irregular versus surrounding typography; field text has unusual intra-value spacing.
Possible field replacement: field typography differs from nearby text; field text spacing is irregular versus surrounding typography; field baseline is shifted versus nearby row content.
Extracted bank fields
Expected: N/A · Found: N/A
Required summary fields were not all extracted.
Expected: N/A · Found: N/A
No transaction rows were extracted.